CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Ms. Tanu Bedi, Advocate as Amicus Curiae appointed by Litigation Cell, Punjab and Haryana High Court assisted by Mr. Pushp Jain, Advocate and Mr. Akhil Dadwal, Advocate. Mr. Tushar Tanwar, Advocate and Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate for the respondent –contemnor. ANUPINDER SINGH […]
J U D G M E N T 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeals arise out of a decision of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 04.04.2023 in Application under Section 482 No. 30221 of 2017, whereby the High Court refused to quash a summoning order dated 24.08.2017 passed under Section 319
O R D E R 1 Leave granted. 2 This appeal arises from the order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dated 5th February 2024 in Criminal Appeal No 1060 of 2023 by which the High Court declined to release the appellant on bail in connection with his prosecution under the provisions
Finding the best lawyer in Chandigarh can be a daunting task, especially with the city being a prominent legal hub in northern India. Whether you’re dealing with a corporate dispute, family matters, or criminal charges, having the right legal representation can make all the difference. Here, we’ll guide you through the process of selecting the best
J U D G M E N T C.K. THAKKER, J. 1. The present appeal is filed by the Union of India & Ors. against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Delhi on January 30, 2002 in Civil Writ Petition No. 6281 of 1999. By the said judgment, the High Court
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Mr. Deepak Suri, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Parveen Sharma, Advocate for the caveator-respondent No.1. ALKA SARIN, J. CM-4693-2024 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The delay of 70 days in refiling the appeal is condoned. CM stands disposed off. FAO-1176-2024
J U D G M E N T ABHAY S. OKA, J. 1. Leave granted. FACTUAL ASPECTS 2. These appeals arise out of three separate suits. For convenience, we are referring to the parties with reference to their status in Original Suit No. 12091 of 2010 (Civil Suit no. 331 of 1996). The appellant is
Present:- Court on its own motion. Ms. Tanu Bedi, Advocate as Amicus Curiae and Mr. Abhimanyu Jairath, Advocate. Mr. Arun Gosain, Senior Govt. Counsel for the respondent/UOI. Mr. A.D.S. Sukhija, Addl. AG, Punjab and Mr. Harmandeep Singh Sullar, Senior DAG, Punjab. Mr. Arun Pal Singh, ADGP (Prisons), Punjab (through video conferencing). Mr. Rahul Dev Singh,
J U D G M E N T Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI 1. Leave Granted. 2. These proceedings under Article 136 of the Constitution arose from the interim orders of the Kerala High Court dated 13 January 2023 and 02 February 2023 in a petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus. 3. The appellant
In the domain of legitimate support, the significance of case examination couldn’t possibly be more significant. It fills in as the bedrock whereupon successful portrayal is fabricated, directing backers through the intricacies of lawful matters and enabling them to advocate fanatically for the benefit of their clients. This thorough assessment of current realities, legitimate standards,
